We are now approved and certified by Christians Naturals
Chaga mushroom is God's gift to you
About Us
Selling you the best Chaga as I alone select and inspect the best Chaga for you Certified by Christian Naturals
We are the only company you should buy Chaga from. That is a very bold statement I know but there are good reasons for it. While other companies are located in the cities we are located in the crisp clean forest of Canada. We are at a high price because we are real. It is the same with all fake foods are always very cheap,
I personally collect and find or inspect only the best and cleanest Chaga for you.
I am the first and only one to Categories Chaga in four groups. I make sure you get the best Chaga and not the Chaga people sell that has been rotting on the forest floor or purchased from someone they should not trust.
Here are my Four Different Grades of Canadian Chaga.
Over the years and thru observation of collecting Chaga I am the original and first to classify Chaga into four distinct groups. No one has done this before, not to my knowledge and or is copying me and doing it now.
Grade A Chaga- It is from a Mature healthy tree and the interior is quite consistently hard.
Grade B Chaga- It is from a older tree and the Chaga is very large and the interior is a bit softer.
Grade C Chaga - it is from a dead tree but still standing and the Chaga appears to be dying ( I never use this type of Chaga only the best for you)
Grade D Chaga - it is from a dead tree rotting on the ground and of course I would never use this type of Chaga however no doubt other companies do because they don't even collect it by themselves from the forest.
I will be selling Grade A and B only. Beware of companies that just hire people to search the forest for Chaga as they more than likely pick dead Chaga on the ground for their supplier just to get the money.
Trust only those that live where the Chaga grows! Our prices for our products are worth it. You get what you pay for in this life.
Disclaimer: These statements have not been evaluated by the FDA ,Health Canada . They are for educational purposes only and are not intended to diagnose or treat any condition. Please consult your health care professional with any health-related concerns.
There are no products listed under this category.
the information on this site is not intended to diagnose treat or cure any disease or illness
Natural
Gods blessing done by Christiannaturals.com for our chaga.
Our Promise to You
We care about getting you the best Chaga mushroom available in the clean Canadain Forest. With fake foods cheap may mean it is not real. Becareful and get the best Chaga from me.
Certified by ChristianNaturals.com
Our Services
Natural Chaga
They say many Natives take Chaga every day that they find in the forest.
Chaga (Inonotus obliquus)
We ask all to please donate to Christian Naturals
foods blessed by God. You can donate by going to this link. https://www.gofundme.com/f/help-save-christians-lives-with-blessings?utm_source=customer&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=p_cf+share-flow-1
We would like to thank Carl Sagan
I did his test on Chaga and it is true.
Through their training, scientists are equipped with what Sagan calls a “baloney detection kit” — a set of cognitive tools and techniques that fortify the mind against penetration by falsehoods:
The kit is brought out as a matter of course whenever new ideas are offered for consideration. If the new idea survives examination by the tools in our kit, we grant it warm, although tentative, acceptance. If you’re so inclined, if you don’t want to buy baloney even when it’s reassuring to do so, there are precautions that can be taken; there’s a tried-and-true, consumer-tested method.
But the kit, Sagan argues, isn’t merely a tool of science — rather, it contains invaluable tools of healthy skepticism that apply just as elegantly, and just as necessarily, to everyday life. By adopting the kit, we can all shield ourselves against clueless guile and deliberate manipulation. Sagan shares nine of these tools:
- Wherever possible there must be independent confirmation of the “facts.”
- Encourage substantive debate on the evidence by knowledgeable proponents of all points of view.
- Arguments from authority carry little weight — “authorities” have made mistakes in the past. They will do so again in the future. Perhaps a better way to say it is that in science there are no authorities; at most, there are experts.
- Spin more than one hypothesis. If there’s something to be explained, think of all the different ways in which it could be explained. Then think of tests by which you might systematically disprove each of the alternatives. What survives, the hypothesis that resists disproof in this Darwinian selection among “multiple working hypotheses,” has a much better chance of being the right answer than if you had simply run with the first idea that caught your fancy.
- Try not to get overly attached to a hypothesis just because it’s yours. It’s only a way station in the pursuit of knowledge. Ask yourself why you like the idea. Compare it fairly with the alternatives. See if you can find reasons for rejecting it. If you don’t, others will.
- Quantify. If whatever it is you’re explaining has some measure, some numerical quantity attached to it, you’ll be much better able to discriminate among competing hypotheses. What is vague and qualitative is open to many explanations. Of course there are truths to be sought in the many qualitative issues we are obliged to confront, but finding them is more challenging.
- If there’s a chain of argument, every link in the chain must work (including the premise) — not just most of them.
- Occam’s Razor. This convenient rule-of-thumb urges us when faced with two hypotheses that explain the data equally well to choose the simpler.
- Always ask whether the hypothesis can be, at least in principle, falsified. Propositions that are untestable, unfalsifiable are not worth much. Consider the grand idea that our Universe and everything in it is just an elementary particle — an electron, say — in a much bigger Cosmos. But if we can never acquire information from outside our Universe, is not the idea incapable of disproof? You must be able to check assertions out. Inveterate skeptics must be given the chance to follow your reasoning, to duplicate your experiments and see if they get the same result.
- It dose not get better than this.